Rush Limbaugh, on law student Sandra Fluke, who was denied the ability to testify before the all-male panel considering contraceptive coverage.

Fuck. You.

As ThinkProgress states: “While it’s probably not even worth engaging with Limbaugh on the facts, Fluke’s testimony was about a friend who is a lesbian and needed birth control for non-sexual medical reasons, so he’s only wrong about three times over, and offensive many more times over than that.”

Need we discuss Limbaugh getting caught with Viagra that wasn’t even his? No? How about pointing out that with birth control, it doesn’t matter how much sex you have — taking one pill is enough to prevent pregnancy?

Or how about he’s a misogynistic pig? Is that ok?

(via cognitivedissonance)

oh

announcement: and this is why cis men have no fucking place in repro rights discussions

I don’t care who you are, I don’t care if you’re gay, I don’t care if you’re a ~F~eminist or a feminist ally, I don’t care if you’re pro-choice

when you force your way into these conversations you are bringing this guy with you…I know you think you’re not, and you think you’re special and progressive and wonderful, but you are one slip-up away from Rush Limbaugh, you really are, and I am afraid of you, and I do not trust your opinion on this subject and I never will

your voice is meaningless here

hurts, doesn’t it? to be told your thoughts are worthless and you should just shut up?

yeah, welcome to our world. deal with it.

(via unknowablewoman)

I really disagree that /all/ cis men should be excluded from these discussions. That’s like saying non trans* people can’t be included in trans* issue discussions. That’s a generalization of an entire group of people.

In other news, Limbaugh is a dipshit.